Browser print preview not available. Professional View users, please use the printer friendly version. We have updated our Privacy Policy.
By continuing to use this website, you are agreeing to the new Privacy Policy and any updated website Terms. It oversees company financial reporting and market activity and has the power to levy fines and bring lawsuits if rules are broken. The FASB is an independent organization that creates financial reporting standards for public and governmental organizations. Its role is to ensure that companies report financial information in a clear and ethical way, and that accounting practices are consistent.
This ensures that anyone reading a financial report can understand what information is given, what is meant by various terms and how financial operations are functioning. The SEC requires all publicly traded companies to provide detailed financial reports to the public on a quarterly basis and uses the FASB standards as a format for those reports.
Issues needing attention often can be attributed to new and unique transactions that arise in the marketplace, but they also may arise from the authoritative literature. The SEC staff frequently learns of these issues when companies engage us in a dialogue as to the appropriate financial reporting answer in advance of an event or transaction, commonly referred to as "pre-clearing" an accounting question.
While these pre-clearance questions usually relate to single transactions, trends tend to develop surrounding certain issues. When they do, the staff refers these issues to the FASB and its interpretative bodies for guidance. The staff also gains insights from the selective review process performed by the Division of Corporation Finance and actions taken by the Division of Enforcement.
For example, the SEC staff asked the FASB to add revenue recognition to its agenda because approximately one-half of restatements and one-half of all enforcement actions relate to revenue recognition. These projects include business combinations, because of issues related to the pooling-of-interests method of accounting, and accounting for financial instruments at fair value, which the SEC staff referred to the FASB because of transparency issues related to derivatives, investments and loans.
We have a responsibility to refer such issues to the FASB, and the FASB has a responsibility to address the issues we refer to them in a timely manner. Some of the issues the SEC staff encounters do not require a fundamental change to existing accounting or completion of a major project by the FASB. In this manner, timely and appropriate guidance can be provided to preparers and auditors before inappropriate practices become ingrained. The cooperative effort between the public and private sectors has given the United States the best financial reporting system in the world, and the Commission is intent on making it even better.
Now I would like to discuss more fully the importance of transparent financial reporting to our capital markets. A primary goal of the federal securities laws is to promote honest and efficient markets and informed investment decisions through full and fair disclosure. Transparency in financial reporting - that is, the extent to which financial information about a company is visible and understandable to investors and other market participants - is central to meeting this goal.
Therefore, it is critical that all public companies provide transparent disclosures that result in an understandable, comprehensive and reliable portrayal of their financial condition and performance. A company's financial statements form the core of its required SEC filings and greatly influence the content of the mandated disclosures included elsewhere in the documents. Thus, audited financial statements, and the standards that underlie them, play a fundamental role in making our markets the most efficient, liquid, and resilient in the world.
The Securities Act of and the Securities Exchange Act of each clearly state the authority of the Commission to prescribe the methods to be followed in the preparation of accounts and the form and content of financial statements to be filed under the Acts.
The quality of our accounting standards and our capital markets can be attributed in large part to the private sector standard-setting process, as overseen by the SEC. The primary private sector standard setter is the FASB, which was established in An oversight body appoints the members of the FASB. This oversight body, the Financial Accounting Foundation, or FAF, is comprised of investors, business people, and accountants. The FASB's standards set forth recognition, measurement, and disclosure principles to be used in preparing financial statements.
Historically, the determinations by the FASB and its predecessors generally have been regarded, by the Commission, as being responsive to the needs of investors. Lately, however, concerns have arisen that the FASB is not being as responsive as it should be.
Even before the recent events, the SEC staff called upon the FASB to work with us to address concerns about timeliness, transparency, and complexity. Specifically, we asked the FASB to address the following concerns:.
As we contemplate reform, we need to consider how we got here. So it is important to understand how the current system of standard setting evolved. In its nearly year history, the FASB has undertaken a series of projects to drastically change how financial information is reported to investors and other financial users. These projects, which include consolidation of financial statements and accounting for financial instruments at fair value, represent major conceptual changes in financial reporting.
As you might expect, such sweeping change has been very controversial and sapped the resources of the FASB. As a result, the FASB has not issued comprehensive guidance on issues such as revenue recognition and consolidation of special purpose entities.
Mark-to-market accounting can become inaccurate if market prices change unpredictably. Buyers and sellers may claim a number of specific instances when this is the case, including inability to both accurately and collectively value the future income and expenses, often due to unreliable information and over optimistic and over pessimistic expectations.
In September , the U. Under GAAP, there is only one measurement model for fair value with limited exceptions. GAAP defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability at the measurement date. Note that fair value is an exit price, which may differ from the transaction entry price.
Various IFRS standards use slightly varying wording to define fair value. At inception, transaction entry price generally is considered fair value. Following the Enron scandal, changes were made to mark to market via the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in Sarbanes-Oxley affected mark to market by forcing companies to implement stricter accounting standards. These included more transparency in financial reporting and stronger internal controls to prevent and identify fraud and auditor independence.
This act also implemented harsher penalties for fraud, such as enhanced prison sentences and fines for committing fraud. Although the law was created to restore investor confidence, the cost of implementing the regulations caused many companies to avoid registering on U. Internal Revenue Code Section contains the mark to market accounting method rule for taxation. It provides that qualified security dealers who elect mark to market treatment shall recognize gain or loss as if the property were sold for its fair market value on the last business day of the year, and any gain or loss shall be taken into account in that year.
The section also provides that commodities dealers can elect mark to market treatment for any commodity or their derivatives which is actively traded i.
Stock option expensing is a method of accounting for the value of share options, distributed as incentives to employees, within the profit and loss reporting of a listed business. On the income statement, balance sheet, and cash flow statement it should say that the loss from the exercise is accounted for by noting the difference between the market price if one exists of the shares and the cash received, the exercise price, for issuing those shares through the option.
Opponents of considering options as an expense say that the real loss—due to the difference between the exercise price and the market price of the shares—is already stated on the cash flow statement.
They would also point out that a separate loss in earnings per share due to the existence of more shares outstanding is also recorded on the balance sheet by noting the dilution of shares outstanding. Simply, accounting for this on the income statement is believed to be redundant.
Currently, the future appreciation of all shares issued are not accounted for on the income statement but can be noted upon examination of the balance sheet and cash flow statement. Only the fair-value method is currently U.
Since companies generally issue stock options with exercise prices which are equal to the market price, the expense under this method is generally zero. In , another method was suggested—expensing the options as the difference between the market price and the strike price when the options are exercised, and not expensing options which are not exercised, and reflecting the unexercised options as a liability on the balance sheet. This method, which defers the expense, also was requested by companies.
Privacy Policy. Skip to main content. Introduction to Accounting. Search for:. Conventions and Standards. Learning Objectives Differentiate between GAAP constraints, assumptions and principles, and the role they play in the preparation of financial statements. Key Takeaways Key Points GAAP includes the standards, conventions, and rules accountants follow in recording and summarizing, and in the preparation of financial statements. GAAP is a codification of how CPA firms and businesses prepare and present their business income and expense, assets and liabilities in their financial statements.
GAAP is not a single accounting rule, but rather an aggregate of many rules on how to account for various transactions. GAAP has four basic objectives, assumptions, principles, and constraints. The assessment of what is material is a matter of professional judgment.
0コメント